Which fighting position offers greater protection from indirect fire compared to the T-shaped position?

The horse-shoe fighting position offers greater protection from indirect fire compared to the T-shaped position due to its design, which enhances concealment and cover. In a horse-shoe configuration, the layout typically includes protective walls or barriers that wrap around the position, creating a more secure space for personnel and equipment.

This design minimizes the vulnerability to overhead fire, including artillery and mortar explosions, by allowing the occupants to be shielded from multiple angles. The curved nature of the horse-shoe can deflect shrapnel and debris, reducing the risk of injury or damage to the personnel inside. Additionally, the position's orientation can be advantageous for defensive purposes, providing better vantage points for observation and engagement while maintaining safety from enemy fire.

In contrast, other positions like the L-shaped or T-shaped positions do not provide the same level of encapsulation or directional shielding against overhead threats, making them less effective in protecting against indirect fire. The protective features of the horse-shoe make it a preferred choice in combat situations where indirect fire is a significant concern.