In an attachment support relationship, who typically has tactical control?

In an attachment support relationship, the supported unit leader typically has tactical control because their unit is the one receiving support and is primarily responsible for integrating that support into their operations. This leader understands the specific operational needs and the tactical environment in which their unit is operating, allowing them to effectively coordinate and direct the actions of the supporting assets.

This dynamic enables the supported unit to dictate how and when to employ the attached support, ensuring that it aligns with their tactical objectives. The supported unit leader has the requisite situational awareness and is better positioned to optimize the use of resources based on the mission requirements and environmental factors.

In contrast, roles like the company commander, squad leader, and weapons platoon commander may influence the overall strategy or provide support resources but do not have the tactical control that the supported unit leader possesses in this specific operational framework. Their responsibilities tend to encompass broader oversight, planning, or management rather than direct tactical execution in the heat of the moment.